Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Roderick Washington v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 2:2010cv00468
Respondent:
Board of Parole Hearings and Matthew Cate
Petitioner:
Roderick Washington
Juan M Achan et al v. Los Angeles City of et al
as 2:2004cv04334
Plaintiff:
Juan M Achan, Daniel P Ackley, Stephen R Addleman and others
Defendant:
Defendant City of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ricky Pickett v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv03955
Defendant:
Fred Aguiar, Ken Allen, Parole Agent Almazon and others
Movant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Ricky Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marilyn Kaye Freeman v. Matthew Cates
as 2:2009cv07719
Petitioner:
Marilyn Kaye Freeman
Respondent:
Matthews Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gustavo Gomez v. Matthew Cate
as 2:2009cv07701
Petitioner:
Gustavo Gomez
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Michael Balbo v. A. Hedgpeth et al
as 5:2009cv01967
Petitioner:
John Michael Balbo
Respondent:
A. Hedgpeth and Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobby Windell Lee v. Matthew Cate
as 2:2009cv07615
Petitioner:
Bobby Windell Lee
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia Carlos v. Mathew Cates
as 2:2009cv07472
Petitioner:
Garcia Carlos
Respondent:
Mathew Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce R. Senator v. Arnold Schwarzenneger et al
as 2:2009cv07477
Plaintiff:
Bruce R. Senator
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenneger, Matthew Cate and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
