Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Fairhope, LLC v. Sunbelt General Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02834
Plaintiff:
Fairhope, LLC and Fairhope, LLC
Defendant:
Sunbelt General Contractors, Inc., Steve Fuller, Chris Head and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type:
Other Statutes
Harris-Clark v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2009mi00413
Plaintiff:
Sheila Harris-Clark
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Rod Moore's Body Shop, Electrical Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Type:
Other Statutes
Ocain et al v. Haggerty et al
as 1:2009cv02427
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ocain, Shawn Ocain, Morale Ocain and others
Defendant:
Odell Haggerty, Mail Contractors of America, Inc. and American Home Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Type:
Other Statutes
Andritz, Inc. v. Southern Maintenance Contractor, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Andritz, Inc. and Andritz, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Maintenance Contractor, LLC, William Pettit and Roger Harper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rumble v. Phoenix Brokers, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sandy Rumble and Sandy Rumble
Defendant:
Phoenix Brokers, Inc., Contractors Bonding Limited and Contractors Bonding Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Werth v. Johns Manville Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02012
Plaintiff:
Albert Von Der Werth, Albert Von Der Werth and Albert Von Der Werth
Defendant:
Johns Manville Corporation, Johns Manville Corporation, Johns Manville Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. v. Contractors Unlimited, Inc. et al
as 1:2007mi00037
Plaintiff:
Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C.
Defendant:
Contractors Unlimited, Inc. and Shane Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
