Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Witmer v. Perry Ellis International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv23942
Defendant:
BRUCE J KLATSKY, MICHAEL W RAYDEN, Joe Arriola and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Ellis v. Seterus, Inc.
as 8:2017cv01254
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ellis
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Powell v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv00528
Plaintiff:
Pamela Powell
Defendant:
Wanda Leigh Brown, C. David Brown, II, C. David Brown, II, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sallah v. National Strategic Corporation LLC et al
as 9:2016cv80611
Plaintiff:
James D. Sallah
Defendant:
National Strategic Corporation LLC, RBS Investment Group, LLC, S Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Robinson v. Section 23 Property Owner's Association, Inc., A Florida Corporation
as 2:2016cv14127
Plaintiff:
Albert Robinson
Defendant:
Section 23 Property Owner's Association, Inc., A Florida Corporation, Rico, Keathel Chauncey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Ellis v. Warner, et al
as 4:2015cv10134
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Ellis
Defendant:
Richard E Warner , Nancy Warner, Patricia Stedman and others
Counter_claimant:
Richard E Warner
Counter_defendant:
Carolyn Ellis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cox et al v. Randazza Legal Group et al
as 1:2013cv21924
Defendant:
Michael Whiteacre, Randazza Legal Group, Marc J. Randazza and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox and 1-50 John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
