Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Petersen v. Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv04385
Plaintiff: Jeval Petersen
Defendant: Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Rushmore Recoveries X LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv61486
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cheng v. Mel Harris & Associates
as 1:2009cv05867
Plaintiff: Jimmy Cheng
Defendant: Mel Harris & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BAYLIS v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A. et al
as 5:2008cv03392
Plaintiff: DIANNE BAYLIS
Defendant: WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., MEL S. HARRIS, MEL S. HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05503
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Gregory et al v. LR Credit 11, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00419
Plaintiff: Louisa Gregory and John Gregory
Defendant: LR Credit 11, LLC and Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00750
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04057
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jerry Jones, et al v. Harris Associates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1624
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY N. JONES, MARY F. JONES and ARLINE WINERMAN
Defendant - Appellee: HARRIS ASSOCIATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01847
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?