Cases 21 - 30 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02566
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hamilton v. AquaVenture Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2020cv01227
Defendant:
Timothy Whall, Debra Coy, Richard F. Reilly and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Hamilton
Hamilton v. Brite Advisors USA, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00085
Petitioner:
Bradley Hamilton
Respondent:
Brite Advisors USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Cain et al v. Chebat Portfolio Management, LLC
as 1:2019cv01463
Defendant:
Chebat Portfolio Management, LLC, d/b/a Crestwood Capital, LLC, Jimmy Chebat and Chebat Portfolio Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandi Cain, Tessla Griswold and Laurie Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mansell v. SunCoke Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04165
Defendant:
SunCoke Energy, Inc., Michael G. Rippey, John W. Rowe and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Mansell
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019cv02421
Defendant:
Theresa Sackler, Mortimer D A Sackler, Rhodes Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Baldwin County, AL, Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL and others
Petitioner:
Town of Swampscott, MA and Pasco County, FL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Weber v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2019cv01352
Plaintiff:
David Weber
Defendant:
Gary G. Gemignani, Troy Hamilton and Gary S. Jacob
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
