Cases 21 - 28 of 28
COUNTY OF HUDSON v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv09029
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. , PURDUE PHARMA INC. , THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BERGEN COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv08845
Plaintiff:
BERGEN COUNTY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., DR. RICHARD SACKLER, ESTATE OF MORTIMER SACKLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SARDELLA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv08706
Plaintiff:
LOU SARDELLA
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMA INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC
as 3:2018cv08155
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC , WARNER CHILCOTT (US), LLC , WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
THE TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al
as 3:2017cv13462
Plaintiff:
THE TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., PURDUE PHARMA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
THE TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv13462
Plaintiff:
THE TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., PURDUE PHARMA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv12155
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMA, INC., PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC. v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02132
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC.
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ALERT MARKETING, INC., ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
