Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Corporation Tbk et al
as 3:2013mc00055
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant:
PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Corporation Tbk, PT Pabrick Kertas Tjiwi Kimia Tbk and Asia Pulp and Paper Company Ltd
Valentine v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 3:2012mc00003
Plaintiff:
Dawna Valentine
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
United States of America v. Omar et al
as 3:2012cv03055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mugeer Subhi Omar
Garnishee:
Affiliated Bank, Dale Resources LLC, Edward D Jones & CO LP and others
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
United States of America v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Trina Yvette Jenkins and Van Arbon Jenkins
Garnishee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
United States of America v. Barton et al
as 3:2010cv01742
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Todd Allen Barton
Garnishee:
Dell Inc, Hewitt Associates LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
United States of America v. Robinson et al
as 3:2010cv01708
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Robinson
Garnishee:
Harris Associates LP, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA , The Southern Company and others
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 7:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Estiverne v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 4:2007mc00021
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Estiverne
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
