Cases 21 - 30 of 66
SERVICES, INC. et al v. XAYPANYA et al
as 3:2018cv12348
Plaintiff:
SDSA, INC., ANNI DRIVE, INC., RICHARD MALINOWSKI and others
Defendant:
PHAMY TRACX XAYPANYA, HACKPROOF LABS, INC., ELIZABETH WEYAND and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
MICHAEL H. ANSELL, ESQ., THOMAS M. KELLY, III and JOHN MUHALL
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PHAMY XAYPANYA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COOPER v. MEDIMETRIKS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv11987
Defendant:
MEDIMETRIKS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PHV ROSS M. GOOD and PHV RYAN M. KELLY
Plaintiff:
RUTH ANN COOPER
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
KUBU v. EISENBERG et al
as 2:2018cv09124
Plaintiff:
JERRY THOMAS KUBU
Defendant:
STEVEN K EISENBERG , JACUELINE F MCNALLY , DAVID M LAMBROPOULOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SOMOGYI et al v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORP.
as 1:2017cv06546
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SOMOGYI and KELLY WHYLE SOMOGYI
Defendant:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
MASER v. RING et al
as 2:2017cv04549
Plaintiff:
RICHARD K. MASER
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M. RING, DAVID M. BARRETT, ROBERT M. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
TANGUMA v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03977
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STANFORD TANGUMA
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC., TIMOTHY M RING, DAVID M BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP INC. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00267
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and BRIDGET ANNE KELLY
Movant:
NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP INC. , BLOOMBERG L.P. , NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
