Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Con Edison Co NY Inc v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 01-1503
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent: NRG Power Marketing, Inc., Independent Power Producers of New York, Inc., KeySpan-Ravenswood, Inc. and others
Intervenor: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. and Long Island Lighting Company, doing business as LIPA
Intervenor For Petitioner: Municipal Electric Utilities Association of New York State
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 02-1134
Plaintiff-Appellant: CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee: GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of Energy, GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and others
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V CHEVRON
as 01-1565
Plaintiff-Appellant: CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee: Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 01-1566
Plaintiff-Appellant: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee: GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of Energy
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. Ashcroft, John D., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 01-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Long Island Lighting Company and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States and Ruth A. Harvey, Attorney, Civil Division, Department of State
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ASHCROFT
as 01-1304
Plaintiff-Appellant: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION and others
Defendant-Appellee: JOHN D. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and JOHN D. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
CON ED V ENERGY
as 00-1370
Defendant-Appellee: BILL RICHARDSON, Secretary of Energy and GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals
Plaintiff-Appellant: CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY INC. and others
Sithe Indep Power v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 00-1092
Petitioner: Sithe/Independence Power Partners, L.P.
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: Public Service Commission of the State of New York, New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation and others
Amer Lung Assn, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 96-1251
Petitioner: American Lung Association, Paul J. Walters and Herbert Raymond Woodruff
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Carol M. Browner, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent: Appalachian Power Company, National Mining Association, American Petroleum Institute and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: Carol Ramey and David Ramey
TN Valley Muni Gas v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 93-1566
Petitioner: Tennessee Valley Municipal Gas Association
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: ANR Pipeline Company, Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company, Vastar Gas Marketing, Inc. and others
Terminated Party: ARCO Oil and Gas Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: Northern Illinois Gas Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?