Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Timothy Walker v. Mark Inch
as 19-14772
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY F. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK S. INCH
McGuire v. Inch
as 19-3673
Respondent / Appellee:
Mark S. Inch, Secretary, State of Florida, Ashley Moody, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tommy R. McGuire
McGuire v. Inch
as 19-3679
Respondent / Appellee:
Attorney General Ashley Moody, Secretary Mark S. Inch, State of Florida and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tommy R. McGuire
Jonathan Hill v. Secretary, FL Dept of Corr., et al
as 19-14379
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, MARK S. INCH and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN RAWSHIELD HILL
Sabir v. Williams
as 19-3575
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James J. Conyers and Rafiq Sabir
Defendant:
Hugh J. Hurwitz, in his individual capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mark S. Inch, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and Thomas R. Kane, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
Defendant / Appellant:
D.K. Williams, in her individual and official capacity as Warden of FCI Danbury and Herman Quay, in his individual capacity
Nathan Kinard v. Mark Inch
as 19-13234
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN MATTHEW KINARD
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK S. INCH
Terence Sasaki v. Mark Inch, et al
as 19-16519
Defendant / Appellee:
DUTTON, C/O, FSL - Elkton, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CLERK(S), NERO, SCHMIDT, CSO, FSL - Elkton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERENCE SASAKI
Richard Hunter v. Mark Inch
as 19-12600
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK S INCH and MARK S. INCH
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE HUNTER
In Re: Tommy R. McGuire
as 19-1855
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Ashley Moody, Attorney General of State of Florida and Mark S. Inch, Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections
Courtney Henderson v. Mark Inch
as 19-12077
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK S INCH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MARK S. INCH
Petitioner / Appellant:
COURTNEY D. HENDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
