Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mohan Kumar et al v. Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv07474
Plaintiff:
Byrson Realty I Corporation, Mohan Kumar, Akila Kumar and others
Defendant:
RBS Financial Products, Inc., RBS Securities, Inc., Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Newcomb Anderson McCormick, Inc. v. ARC Alternatives et al
as 3:2014cv01870
Plaintiff:
Newcomb Anderson McCormick, Inc.
Defendant:
ARC Alternatives , Russell Driver , Curtis Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cognimem Technologies, Inc. et al v. Paillet et al
as 2:2013cv00915
Plaintiff:
Cognimem Technologies, Inc. and Bruce MCCormick
Defendant:
Guy Paillet , Anne Menendez , General Vision, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Anne Menendez , Cognitive Silicon Group, Inc. , Guy Paillet and others
Counter_defendant:
Cognimem Technologies, Inc. and Bruce MCCormick
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Leeman v. McCormick & Company Incorporated
as 4:2013cv01662
Plaintiff:
Whitney R. Leeman
Defendant:
McCormick & Company Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCormick et al v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2012cv01389
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McCormick and Janet McCormick
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jo Anna Canzoneri McCormick v. Steven Chang et al
as 2:2011cv02300
Defendant:
Steven Chang, City of Alhambra, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Jo Anna Canzoneri McCormick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
