Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Victoria Giampa v. Midfirst Bank, et al
as 17-17438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORIA GIAMPA
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, FANNIE MAE, FANNIE MAE AS TRUSTEE FOR SECURITIZED TRUST and others
Paul Oh v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
as 2:2017cv08761
Defendant:
National Default Servicing Corporation, Salem Investments LLC and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Plaintiff:
Paul Oh
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tracie Greathouse v. Long Beach Mortgage Company et al
as 5:2017cv01905
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank NT, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Tracie Greathouse
Samantha Sharman v. National Default Servicing Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv05738
Defendant:
National Default Servicing Corporation and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Samantha Sharman
Gordon Richardson v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04632
Defendant:
Does, National Default Servicing Corporation, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Richardson
Bryan A. London et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2017cv04181
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan A London and Susan R London
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giampa v. Midfirst Bank et al
as 2:2017cv01208
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America NA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Giampa
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Laura Saterbak v. NDSC, et al
as 17-55170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURA D. SATERBAK
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
