Cases 21 - 30 of 1,582
Eakins v. Austin Lloyd, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Annamarie F Eakins and Annamarie F. Eakins
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc, Austin Coins, Inc., Brandon E Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nowell v. Austin Coins, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nowell
Defendant:
Austin Coins, Inc, Eric P Lesak, Timothy James King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fikse v. Austin Lloyd, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
John H Fikse and John H. Fikse
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc., Austin Coins, Inc., Eric P. Lesak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brown v. EngageSmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11011
Plaintiff:
Donald Brown
Defendant:
EngageSmart, Inc., Paul G. Stamas, Robert P. Bennett and others
McCall v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company et al
as 1:2023cv10936
Plaintiff:
Marla McCall
Defendant:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company, J. Kenneth Thompson, A. R. Alameddine and others
Schwarz v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company et al
as 1:2023cv10915
Plaintiff:
Ross Schwarz
Defendant:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company, J. Kenneth Thompson, A. R. Alameddine and others
Polilingua Limited v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv08810
Plaintiff:
Polilingua Limited
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Parker et al v. Beard et al
as 1:2023cv10028
Plaintiff:
Jeff Parker and Tian Yang
Defendant:
Gregory A. Beard, William B. Spence, Ricardo R.A. Larroude and others
Nominal Defendant:
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bhavsar et al. v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv09452
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, David Mindnich and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
