Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Rupert Dunn v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-13824
Petitioner: RUPERT ALEXANDER DUNN
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
RUPERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-96605
Plaintiff: RUPERT
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
McPherson v. Lamont
as 20-2949
Plaintiff / Appellee: Pattikate Williams-Void, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Roe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Tre McPherson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor: Derrick Taylor and Rupert A Thompson
Defendant / Appellee: Ned Lamont, in their individual capacities and Rollin Cook, in their individual capacities
Petitioner / Appellant: Michael A. Young
RUPERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-73757
Plaintiff: RUPERT
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
RUPERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-71804
Plaintiff: RUPERT
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Stanford v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv05289
Defendant: Kenneth Cuccinelli, Acting Sec. of DHS Chad Wolf, Field Office Directo SUSAN QUINTANA and others
Plaintiff: Dean Rupert Stanford
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
RUPERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-53014
Plaintiff: RUPERT
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
RUPERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-43592
Plaintiff: RUPERT
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Floyd Murray v. U.S. Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-11936
Petitioner: FLOYD RUPERT MURRAY
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00431
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?