Other Statutes Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Cocchi et al v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09064
Defendant: Tremont Group Holdings, Inc. , Tremont Partners, Inc. , Rye Select Broad Market Fund, LP and others
Plaintiff: Robert Cocchi , Penni Ellen Fromm , PEF Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Giant Group Ltd. v. Sands
as 1:2012mc00024
Plaintiff: Giant Group Ltd.
Defendant: Glenn A. Sands
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Credit Agricole Coporate and Investment Bank New York Branch et al v. Whitehorse I, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv04990
Plaintiff: Credit Agricole Coporate and Investment Bank New York Branch, Apidos CDO I, Ltd., Apidos CDO II, Ltd. and others
Defendant: BDC Finance, L.L.C. , Black Diamond Commercial Finance, L.L.C. , Black Diamond Capital Management, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. The Collinwood Shale Brick and Supply Company et al
as 1:2010mc00068
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant: The Collinwood Shale Brick and Supply Company, Chagrin River Hardwood Company , Collinwood Concrete, Inc. and others
Rembaum et al v. Banco Santander, S.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04095
Plaintiff: Abraham Rembaum , Mina Rembaum , Alberto Bellow and others
Defendant: Banco Santander, S.A., Optimal Investment Services, S.A. and Jonathan Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
AIS Ventures, LLC et al v. Xirinachs et al
as 2:2008cv03622
Plaintiff: AIS Ventures, LLC and Andrew Smoler
Defendant: Michael J. Xirinachs, John Livecchi, Robert Rocco and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wootton v. Granite Golf Corporation et al
as 2:2008mc00216
Plaintiff: Roger Wootton
Defendant: Granite Golf Corporation, Brassie Golf Corporation, The Incorporated Village of Sands Point and others
United States v. Ludlow's Sand and Gravel Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00793
Plaintiff: United States and United States
Defendant: Ludlow's Sand and Gravel Company, Inc. and G. Kevin Ludlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party: Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court: Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff: Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant: Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader: MNZ Inc
Respondent: Visa Inc.
Intervenor: Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant: Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant: St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Port Dock and Stone Corp. et al v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc. et al
as 2:2005cv04294
Plaintiff: Port Dock and Stone Corp., Gotham Sand & Stone Corp. and Port Dock Holdings Corp.
Defendant: Oldcastle Northeast, Inc., CRH Group, PLC and Tilcon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?