Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Johnny Ingle v. Shelby County, et al
as 21-5157
Respondent / Appellee: FLOYD BONNER, JR., Sheriff and SHELBY COUNTY
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHNNY L. INGLE
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019op45264
Plaintiff: Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL, Logan County Board of Commissioners, OH and others
Defendant: Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Theresa Sackler and others
Petitioner: Town of Swampscott, MA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
D.B. v. Shelby County Health Care Corp, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6407
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SHELBY COUNTY HEALTH CARE CORPORATION
Petitioner / Appellant: D.B., a minor, by and through his next friend and mother, Antoinette Lundy
In Matter Of Rose H. Vernon v. Shelby Cnty, TN Probate Court, et al
as 20-6402
Defendant / Appellee: SAM POWERS, in his personal capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT, Division I, Official Capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT CLERK, Official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, aka Joseph Dingler and IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, by Joseph Dingler
In Matter Of Rose H. Vernon v. Shelby Cnty, TN Probate Court, et al
as 20-6367
Defendant / Appellee: SAM POWERS, in his personal capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT, Division I, Official Capacity, SHELBY COUNTY, TN PROBATE COURT CLERK, Official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, aka Joseph Dingler and IN THE MATTER OF ROSE H. VERNON, by Joseph Dingler
Bristol Regional Women's Cente, et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6267
Plaintiff / Appellee: KNOXVILLE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND NORTH MISSISSIPPI, formerly known as Planned Parenthood of Middle and East Tennessee, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY and others
Defendant: DR. RENEE SAUNDERS and WILLIAM BYRON LEE
Defendant / Appellant: AMY P. WEIRICH, District Attorney General of Shelby County, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Nashville, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, Attorney General of Tennessee and others
John Doe v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 20-6274
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN JAILER 1 and SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOE
Memphis A.PhillipRandolphInst, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6141
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE TENNESSEE STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, SEKOU FRANKLIN, MEMPHIS AND WEST TENNESSEE AFL-CIO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL and others
Defendant / Appellant: TRE HARGETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Tennessee, MARK GOINS, in his official capacity as Coordinator of Elections for the State of Tennessee and AMY P. WEIRICH, in her official capacity as District Attorney General for Shelby County, Tennessee
Plaintiff: KENDRA LEE
April Heard v. Shelby County Board of Ed, et al
as 20-6052
Plaintiff / Appellant: APRIL HEARD
Defendant / Appellee: MONIQUE THOMAS and SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Memphis Ctr for Repro Health, et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5969
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND NORTH MISSISSIPPI, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, KNOXVILLE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY, on behalf of herself and her patients and others
Defendant / Appellant: LISA PIERCEY, M.D., Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health, in her official capacity, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Davidson County, Tennessee, in his official capacity, CHARME P. ALLEN, District Attorney General of Knox County, Tennessee, in her official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?