Cases 21 - 30 of 361
FEHILY et al v. BIDEN JR. et al
as 3:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
PATRICK FEHILY and DAVID T. MALLEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., GINA RAIMONDO and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HACKER v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00545
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC., FORUM MERGER III CORP., JAMES TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HACKER
WILSON v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., ALEX SHUMATE, DAVID H FERDMAN and others
COFFMAN v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE COFFMAN
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., ALEX SHUMATE, DAVID H FERDMAN and others
JONES v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JONES
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERNAN CONWAY, BRIAN H. HAIMM and others
WILSON v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERNAN CONWAY, BRIAN H. HAIMM and others
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 3:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 1:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOUSEMASTER SPV LLC v. BURKE, JR.
as 3:2021cv20251
Plaintiff:
HOUSEMASTER SPV LLC formerly known as HM SERVICES LLC doing business as HOUSEMASTER formerly known as Housemaster LLC, HM SERVICES LLC and Housemaster LLC
Defendant:
JOHN T. BURKE, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
