Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Nasser v. USCIS District Director et al
as 2:2016cv11737
Plaintiff:
Mohamed M Nasser
Defendant:
USCIS District Director, USDHS, Loretta E Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Abdulla v. USCIS District Director et al
as 2:2015cv13453
Plaintiff:
Hemood Abdulla Abdulla
Defendant:
USCIS District Director, USCIS Detroit District Director, USDHS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sheikh v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2015cv12247
Plaintiff:
Hasan Sheikh
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kimberg v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2014cv12962
Plaintiff:
Terrence Kimberg
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Al Ghaflah v. USCIS et al
as 4:2014cv10275
Plaintiff:
Abbas M. Mohammed Al Ghaflah
Defendant:
USCIS, USCIS Detroit District Director, Eric H Holder, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mezel v. USCIS et al
as 2:2013cv14583
Plaintiff:
Imad Mezel
Defendant:
USCIS , USCIS Detroit District Director , FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mezel v. USCIS Detroit District Director et al
as 2:2013cv14069
Plaintiff:
Imad S Mezel
Defendant:
USCIS Detroit District Director, Robert Mueller, USDHS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fawer Inc. et al v. USCIS et al
as 5:2013cv10289
Defendant:
USCIS, Barbara L McQuade and ERIC H HOLDER JR
Plaintiff:
Fawer Inc. and Jianmin Hu
Corporate Computer Services, Inc et al v. USCIS et al
as 2:2012cv14274
Plaintiff:
Corporate Computer Services, Inc and Naga Kalyna Ramu Veerapaneni
Defendant:
USCIS , Department of Justice and Attorney General of the Eastern District of Michigan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
