Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Kim v. Kimm et al
as 1:2015cv04784
Defendant:
Charlie and You, Inc., Hyung Suk Choi, Jin Young Chung and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kim
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Helfenbein v. Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07828
Plaintiff:
David Helfenbein
Defendant:
Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc., Alexander Lee, Richard W. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Gerald Lee
as 13-3677
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD W. LEE
Lee et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-23030
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee and James W. Lee
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Lee v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 8:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
Stanley W. Lee
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Shevel et al v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation
as AZ/4:13-cv-00609
Plaintiff:
Faye Elizabeth Shevel and W Lee Shevel
Defendant:
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation
Adams et al v. Bruhn et al
as 3:2013cv01027
Plaintiff:
Action Equipment Company, Inc., William Besley Adams, Jr., Ali Al-Abbas and others
Defendant:
Lyman J. Bruhn, Sheila Bruhn, Yusaf Jawed and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Martha Lee
as 12-3891
Debtor - Debtor:
In re: MARTHA W. LEE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTHA W. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
Adams et al v. Bruhn et al
as 3:2011cv01429
Plaintiff:
William Besley Adams, Jr., Marie Ashton, Barbara A. Bersani and others
Defendant:
Lyman J. Bruhn, Sheila Bruhn, Fernanda Declercq and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
