Cases 31 - 40 of 24,689
ABEL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv09036
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PETER ABEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AMGEN INC. v. CELLTRION USA, INC.
as 1:2024cv09052
Plaintiff:
AMGEN INC.
Respondent:
CELLTRION USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
KAYAL ORTHOPEADIC CENTER, PC v. ALLIED BENEFIT SYSTEMS, LLC
as 2:2024cv09046
Respondent:
ALLIED BENEFIT SYSTEMS, LLC
Petitioner:
KAYAL ORTHOPEADIC CENTER, PC,
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. LUCAS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
as 3:2024cv09042
Petitioner:
ZAZZALI, P.C. and LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS
Respondent:
LUCAS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08990
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BRINK'S GLOBAL SERVICES USA, INC. et al v. MORAN
as 2:2024cv09055
Defendant:
SCOTT MORAN
Plaintiff:
THE BRINK'S COMPANY and BRINK'S GLOBAL SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
PRODIGY FINANCE CM2020-1 DAC v. ASAPURE
as 2:2024cv09019
Petitioner:
PRODIGY FINANCE CM2020-1 DAC
Respondent:
ABHISHEK ASAPURE
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
