Cases 31 - 40 of 145
East v. The Central Dauphin School District
as 1:2009cv02573
Plaintiff:
Tara East
Defendant:
The Central Dauphin School District and Luis B. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
HANDEL et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2009cv01678
Plaintiff:
YURIEL HANDEL and SOKHEMARA CHHIV
Defendant:
KAREN FITZGERALD, EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS, DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MAHENDRU et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05375
Plaintiff:
RAJESH MAHENDRU and YVETTE MAHENDRU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ALAMERI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05155
Petitioner:
SALEM ALAMERI
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
THACH v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2008cv05104
Plaintiff:
UTDAM MONY THACH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GONZALEZ v. CREDITOR INTERCHANGE, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04864
Plaintiff:
IRENE RIVERA GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CREDITOR INTERCHANGE, INC., CREDITORS INTERCHANGE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, LLC, ELIZABETH ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LIU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv04573
Plaintiff:
DE QI LIU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF and EMILIO T. GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCKAY v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv04534
Plaintiff:
JOMAH MCKAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2008cv01713
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.