Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Danette Mulvaney et al v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 5:2017cv01044
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, DOES, Deborah D Garcia and others
Mediator (ADR Panel:
Phyllis W Cheng
Plaintiff:
Anita Louise Evans, Danette Mulvaney and Della Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
James Root v. State of California et al
as 5:2018cv00362
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Department of California Highway Patrol, Officer A. Ramborger and others
Plaintiff:
James Root
Dean Himbler Aviles et al v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 5:2017cv02161
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles and Himbler Investments Organization
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and The People of the State of California
Armando Garza v. California Highway Patrol
as 8:2017cv01277
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol
Plaintiff:
Armando Garza
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01906
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , San Diego County, California, San Diego County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv01271
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Plaza Hotel, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bhambra v. County of Nevada et al
as 2:2009cv03124
Plaintiff:
Harjit Bhambra
Defendant:
County of Nevada, Clifford Newell, John Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
California Highway Patrol v. Ingersol
as 4:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
California Highway Patrol
Defendant:
James Robert Ingersol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
O. Schlenvogt v. Scott Marshall, et al
as 08-17196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
O. PAUL SCHLENVOGT
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT MARSHALL, MIGUEL VILLASENOR, MARK TROUGHTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
