Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Spivey v. Cates
as 2:2009cv07502
Petitioner:
Shannon Antonio Spivey
Respondent:
Matthew Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabriel Pizano Campos v. Matthew Cate
as 5:2009cv01919
Petitioner:
Gabriel Pizano Campos
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eriberto Penaloza v. State of California et al
as 2:2009cv07347
Plaintiff:
Eriberto Penaloza
Defendant:
State of California, M. Stallworth, Mathew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Jose Alcala v. Mathew Cate
as 8:2009cv01145
Petitioner:
Jose Alcala
Respondent:
Mathew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damian Eric Griffin v. Matthew Cate
as 5:2009cv01858
Plaintiff:
Damian Eric Griffin
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Gary Sandor, Joe McKinnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Cate et al
as 8:2009cv01117
Petitioner:
Ramon Rosendo Soto
Respondent:
Matthew Cate and Bill Lockyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roy Henry White v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2009cv07071
Petitioner:
Roy Henry White
Respondent:
John Marshall and Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Robert Riker v. James Benedetti et al
as 5:2009cv01786
Petitioner:
David Robert Riker
Respondent:
James Benedetti, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Woodfork v. Aref Fakhoury et al
as 2:2009cv06849
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Woodfork
Defendant:
Aref Fakhoury, Mathew Cate, K Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Lewis v. M. Cate
as 5:2009cv01773
Plaintiff:
William Lewis
Defendant:
M. Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
