Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Qinkai Tan v. Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office et al
as 2:2023cv00816
Plaintiff: QINKAI TAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Yang Zhang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff: YANG ZHANG, YINGNAN SUI, SHIJIAN ZHANG and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Quanhua Wen et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv07603
Plaintiff: QUANHUA WEN and SHAOLIE KE
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE, Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jiayan Tan et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv07602
Plaintiff: JIAYAN TAN, LINGLING CAO and CHENYANG TAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE, Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Defeng Wu et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv05528
Plaintiff: DEFENG WU, LIJUAN ZHANG, YUFEI WU and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jifang Sun et al. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv03638
Plaintiff: JIFANG SUN, DONGMEI QUE and GEWENXIN QUE
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Zhifeng Lu et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv02963
Plaintiff: Zhifeng Lu, Hongru Lu, Tianyi Lu and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chenchen Wu et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00209
Plaintiff: Chenchen Wu, Jiachen Wang, Xiaodong Wang and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chenchen Wu et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv00909
Plaintiff: Chenchen Wu, Jiachen Wang, Xiaodong Wang and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Fitsum Segid v. USCIS, et al
as 21-3333
Plaintiff / Appellant: FITSUM G. SEGID
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOSHOA SUTTON, Director, Indianapolis Field Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?