Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 51
David Herr, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. HERR and PAMELA F. HERR
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, TOM TIDWELL, Chief of the United States Forest Service and others
Intervenor - Intervenor: SWC, LLC, TIMOTHY A. SCHMIDT, FRIENDS OF SYLVANIA and others
Sequoia Forestkeeper v. Teresa Benson, et al
as 15-16649
Plaintiff / Appellee: SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER
Defendant / Appellant: TERESA BENSON, in her official capacity as District Ranger for the Hume Lake Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest, KEVIN ELLIOTT, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Sequoia National Forest, RANDY MOORE, in his official capacity as the Regional Forest of the Pacific Southwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service and others
David Herr, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2381
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. HERR and PAMELA F. HERR
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, TOM TIDWELL, Chief of the United States Forest Service and others
Inyan Kara Riders Motorcycle Club et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2014cv00159
Plaintiff: Inyan Kara Riders Motorcycle Club , Blueribbon Coalition Inc and Justin "JR" Riggins
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Bighorn National Forest, Bighorn National Forest Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. ยง 1600
Robert Luciano, Jr. v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16167
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT A. LUCIANO, Jr., Trustee of The Robert A. Luciano Jr. Revocable Trust Dated February 27, 1995
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 13-1359
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, a Colorado non-profit corporation and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant: TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as the Chief Forester of the U.S. Forest Service, THOMAS MALECEK, in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Rio Grande National Forest and others
Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Cen, et al v. Patricia Grantham, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-16186
Plaintiff - Appellant: KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and KLAMATH FOREST ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICIA GRANTHAM, Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest, KEN HARRIS, District Ranger, Happy Camp/Camp Knoll Ranger District, Klamath National Forest and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Idaho Recreation Council, et al v. USDA, et al
as 12-35763
Plaintiff: VALLEY COUNTY
Plaintiff - Appellant: IDAHO RECREATION COUNCIL, CHRIS SCHWARZHOFF and LOIS SCHWARZHOFF
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TOM VILSACK, in his capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. USFS, et al
as 12-35666
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, ELIZABETH DAVY, in her official capacity as District Ranger of the Caribou-Targhee National Forest, HARV FORSGREN, in his official capacity as Regional Forester of Region 4 of the U.S. Forest Service and others
Oregon Natural Desert Associat, et al v. David Sabo, et al
as 12-35567
Plaintiff - Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION and KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID SABO, District Ranger, Chemult Ranger District, Fremont-Winema National Forests and U.S. FOREST SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?