Cases 31 - 40 of 154
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Costa et al
as 1:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Zachary Costa, Casey Elder, Julian Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Nelson
as 1:2018cv01247
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sandra Nelson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Maupin et al
as 1:2018cv00375
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
William T Maupin and TBOD LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Chacon et al
as 1:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Chacon , James Feldman , Stephen Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Vinas et al
as 5:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Dominic Vinas and Burton Vinas Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Schmitmeyer et al
as 3:2018cv01245
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Chad Schmitmeyer, Christopher T. Wendel, Celina's County Music Authority LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Zang et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Lihong Zang and Leaspring Commercial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Coffland et al
as 2:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Matthew Coffland and Matt's Tiger Pub LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Kinemond et al
as 2:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
James D. Kinemond, Jr., Sharon L. Kinemond, Robert Carl Kuester and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Frame et al
as 5:2017cv00945
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Danny W. Frame and Frames Tavern I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
