Cases 31 - 40 of 70
KING v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00947
Plaintiff:
ANGELA KING
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MASS POLYMERS CORPORATION v. DALTON KING PACKAGING, INC.
as 3:2016cv04578
Petitioner:
MASS POLYMERS CORPORATION
Respondent:
DALTON KING PACKAGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
JAYE v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08324
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. , ERICK P. SPRONCK , ROBERT A. STEPHENSON and others
Cross_claimant:
CLINTON TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY , FOX CHASE CONTRACTING, LLC and FREY ENGINEERING
Cross_defendant:
CLINTON TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY , ACCESS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT , EDWARD BERMAN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JAYE v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv08324
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ERICK P. SPRONCK, ROBERT A. STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KING v. HAIR CLUB FOR MEN LTD., LLC
as 2:2015cv06816
Plaintiff:
RASHEEM KING
Defendant:
HAIR CLUB FOR MEN LTD., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
