Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
City of Sterling Heights Police & Fire Retirement System v. Kohl's Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv01159
Plaintiff:
City of Sterling Heights Police & Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation , Kevin Mansell and Wesley S McDonald
Movant:
Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: Motion to File Affidavit as a Miscellaneous Case/Record
as 2:2012mc00048
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Boon
In re: Subpoena Duces Tecum of David D Ricken
as 1:2012mc00019
Movant:
David L Ricken
Respondent:
Kevin B McCarthy , Albert H Langsenkamp , BVM Foundation Inc and others
Ubrogee_defendant:
Paul Hartman
Scheunemann v. Murphy Desmond Lawyers SC et al
as 2:2011cv01129
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scheunemann
Defendant:
Murphy Desmond Lawyers SC and Robert A Pasch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Voces De La Frontera Inc et al v. Brennan et al
as 2:2011cv01011
Plaintiff:
Voces De La Frontera Inc , Ramiro Vara , Olga Vara and others
Defendant:
Michael Brennan , David Deininger , Gerald Nichol and others
Movant:
F James Sensenbrenner, Jr , Thomas E Petri , Paul D. Ryan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheunemann v. MRS Associates Inc
as 2:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scheunemann
Defendant:
MRS Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
