Cases 31 - 40 of 229
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Zimmer v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv06266
Defendant:
Dow R. Wilson, Jean-Luc Butel, Michelle Le Beau and others
Plaintiff:
David Zimmer
Stein v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv06140
Defendant:
Dow R. Wilson, Regina E. Dugan, Jean-Luc Butel and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
United States of America v. Monica Bagby
as 2:2020cv06744
Defendant:
MONICA BAGBY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garnishee:
Le Sage Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205
Jenkins v. iQIYI, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02882
Defendant:
Herman Yu, Chuan Wang, Xiaodong Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jenkins
Petitioner:
Ronald Hershberger, Le Rivage LLC, Dae Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Kenneth D. Bell v. Todd Disner et al
as 8:2020mc00004
Receiver:
Matthew E Orso
Defendant:
Kevin Thanh Le, Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell and Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Haggmark v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California
as 1:2019cv01742
Defendant:
Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California
Plaintiff:
Jesse Tyler Haggmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAGGMARK v. LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC.
as 1:2019at00896
Defendant:
LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC.
Plaintiff:
JESSE TYLER HAGGMARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffrey Sulitzer, D.M.D, et al v. Joseph Tippins et al
as 2:2019cv08902
Defendant:
M.P.A. Karen M. Fischer, Esq. Meredith McKenzie, D.D.S. Lilian Larin and others
Plaintiff:
SmileDirectClub, LLC, Jeffrey Sulitzer, D.M.D. and D.M.D. Jeffrey Sulitzer
Petitioner:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
