Other Statutes Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
DELRIO-MOCCI et al v. CONNOLLY PROPERTIES INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02753
Plaintiff: MARIBEL DELRIO-MOCCI, LINDA ELLIOT and ROBERT BOLMER
Defendant: CONNOLLY PROPERTIES INC., DAVID M. CONNOLLY, DONNA X. CONNOLLY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LIBERTY BELL BANK v. DEITSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00993
Plaintiff: LIBERTY BELL BANK
Defendant: ERIK JASON DEITSCH, RUSSELL THOMAS DIBELLA, HEMANT JAYANTILAL DESAI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SEARS et al v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05736
Plaintiff: SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, KMART CORPORATION and others
Defendant: MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., MARSH INC., Marsh Global Broking Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
HENLEY MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al v. MARSH INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02389
Plaintiff: HENLEY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, BIG BEAR PROPERTIES, INC., NORTHBROOK PROPERTIES, INC. and others
Defendant: MARSH INC., MARSH USA INC., THE CHUBB CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00757
Plaintiff: AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
Defendant: MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., MARSH, INC., MARSH USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC et al v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC
as 2:2006cv05120
In Re: INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC, NEW CINGULAR PLAINTIFFS, AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES INC and others
Defendant: MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., WURTTEMBERGISCHE VERSICHERUNG A.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?