Cases 31 - 38 of 38
VON NOTHAUS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
BERNARD VON NOTHAUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, EDWARD R. RYAN, MARK T. ODULIO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
VALORE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2003cv01959
Plaintiff:
TERANCE J. VALORE , JUANITA R. GOLDFARB , MARY V. HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
UPSON v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv00360
Plaintiff:
DEANNE ROSE UPSON
Defendant:
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, TONJE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC v. ROSE'S DREAM, INC.
as 1:2009cv01533
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC
Defendant:
ROSE'S DREAM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Theft of Satellite Communications Services
FICKEN v. GOLDEN et al
as 1:2009mc00071
Petitioner:
IVAN FICKEN
Respondent:
OLIVIA GOLDEN, ROSE MONTGOMERY DAVID, EMMANUAL MBADIUGHA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JACOBS et al v. FRIEDMAN et al
as 1:2008cv01458
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL K. JACOBS and NANCY HECKERMAN
Defendant:
SIDNEY S. FRIEDMAN, GREG I. ROSE, WEINSTOCK, FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JACOBS et al v. FRIEDMAN et al
as 1:2007cv01625
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL K. JACOBS and NANCY M. HECKERMAN
Defendant:
SIDNEY S. FRIEDMAN, VIJAY PATEL, DILIP PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00926
Plaintiff:
PETER ROSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
