Cases 31 - 40 of 269
CICCOTELLI v. UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05610
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PEGGY YVONNE FLOWER, BRYAN L TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
MINEHAN v. MCDOWELL et al
as 2:2021cv05314
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MINEHAN
Defendant:
ERIC G. MCDOWELL, ANDREW T. LUNNEY and MCFADDEN SCOTT INSURANCE LLC
Nominal Defendant:
CHRISTI INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
CICCOTELLI v. INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05296
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC., SCOTT F. SCHAEFFER, WILLIAM C DUNKELBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04885
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC., PATRICK J MAHAFFY, MICHAEL D CLAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS, LLC v. PEARSALL
as 2:2021cv04687
Plaintiff:
AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant:
SCOTT PEARSALL
WHITFIELD v. TRILLIUM THERAPEUTICS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04534
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
TRILLIUM THERAPEUTICS INC., LUKE BESHAR, MICHAEL KAMARCK and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
PENNSYLVANIA INFORMED CONSENT ADVOCATES, INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM et al
as 5:2021cv04415
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA INFORMED CONSENT ADVOCATES, INC.
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM, SCOTT KETCHAM and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WHITFIELD v. SELECT INTERIOR CONCEPTS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04329
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
SELECT INTERIOR CONCEPTS, INC., DONALD MCALEENAN, ROBERT SCOTT VANSANT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv04054
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION, SCOTT N GREENBERG, TAMAR ELKELES and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
