Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Taylor v. Sisto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01194
Petitioner: Peter A. Taylor
Respondent: D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter Williams v. D. Sisto
as 09-71455
Petitioner: WALTER WILLIAMS
Respondent: D. K. SISTO
Richard Munns v. D. Sisto
as 09-71254
Petitioner: RICHARD B. MUNNS
Respondent: D. K. SISTO, Warden
In Re: Online DVD Rental Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2009md02029
Plaintiff: Gary Bunker, John Haley, Andrea Resnick and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: A Plaintiffs
Defendant: Netflix, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.com USA LLC
Interested Party: Yahoo! Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Stephen C. Griffis, Theodore H Frank, Jill Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Augustin Hernandez v. D. Sisto
as 09-71020
Petitioner: AUGUSTIN P. HERNANDEZ
Respondent: D. K. SISTO
Abdullah Mustafaa v. D.K. Sisto
as 09-70654
Petitioner: ABDULLAH W. MUSTAFAA
Respondent: D.K. SISTO
Victor Quintana v. D. Sisto
as 09-70314
Petitioner: VICTOR JOSE QUINTANA
Respondent: D. K. SISTO
Lynch et al v. Walmart.com USA LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00138
Plaintiff: Scott Lynch, Scott Lynch, Scott Lynch and others
Defendant: Walmart.com USA LLC, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
James Edwards, et al v. USDC-CAN
as 09-70086
: In re: JAMES EUGENE EDWARDS and DAVID E. EDWARDS
Petitioner: JAMES EUGENE EDWARDS and DAVID E. EDWARDS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: D.K. SISTO, Warden, CSP Solano
Kerry Rodgers v. D. K. Sisto
as 08-75057
Petitioner: KERRY LEMONTE RODGERS
Respondent: JAMES A. YATES and D.K. SISTO, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?