Cases 31 - 40 of 212
Harrison County, Mississippi et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04561
Plaintiff:
Harrison County, Mississippi , Magnolia Regional Health Center and Cullman Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LD Construction LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04239
Plaintiff:
LD Construction LLC , LDLJ Associates, L.P. , Lawrence W. Gardner and others
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant:
Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Petitioner:
Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Genesee County Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04089
Plaintiff:
Genesee County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kansas City, Missouri Employees' Retirement System v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04005
Plaintiff:
Kansas City, Missouri Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Tera Group, Inc. et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02858
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tera Group, Inc, Tera Advanced Technologies, LLC, TeraExchange, LLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
TERA GROUP, INC. et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02837
Plaintiff:
TERA GROUP, INC., TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TERAEXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Richard Dennis et al v. Barclays Bank plc et al
as 1:2016cv00464
Defendant:
Barclays Bank plc, Barclays Capital Inc., Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenfleenbank B.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Dennis and Frontpoint European Fund L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015md02673
Plaintiff:
Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Robert L. Teel and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
American Federation of Teachers, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, Rogers Varner, Jr. and others
Defendant:
TD Securities (USA) LLC, Jeffries LLC, Barclays Bank, PLC and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund, University of Puerto Rico Retirement System, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Bank of America Corp. and John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
