Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Gregorio v. United Parcel Service Ground Freight, Inc.
as 2:2016at01312
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Ground Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Gregorio
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Holl v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05856
Plaintiff:
Randall Holl
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wayne Moule v. United Parcel Service Company
as 1:2016at00055
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Company
Plaintiff:
Wayne Moule
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741
Moule v. United Parcel Service Co.
as 1:2016cv00102
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co.
Plaintiff:
Wayne Moule
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741
Bryant Family Vineyard v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Bryant Family Vineyard
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norman Harris et al v. United Parcel Service Inc. Ohio et al
as 2:2015cv03980
Defendant:
Crawford and Company, Does, Carlos Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Harris and Normans Rare Guitars Inc
Lisa Flores et al v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01182
Plaintiff:
Lisa Flores and Mary Lee
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co, United Parcel Service General Services Co, United Parcel Service Inc and others
Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co.
as 2:2013cv09515
Plaintiff:
Bleachtech LLC and Joe Solo
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co.
AFMS LLC v. United Parcel Service Co. et al
as 3:2012cv01503
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation and United Parcel Service Co.
Plaintiff:
AFMS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
One (1) United Parcel Service ("UPS) package with manifest airway bill number 406-266010695 and UPS tracking number 1Z3097590441346788
as 2:2011mj01821
Defendant:
One (1) United Parcel Service ("UPS) package with manifest airway bill number 406-266010695 and UPS tracking number 1Z3097590441346788 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
