Cases 41 - 50 of 30,445
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC. et al v. WILSON et al
as 2:2024mc00034
Plaintiff:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW WILSON, PEAK QUALITY PRODUCTS, LLC and HIXWOOD METAL LLC
Interested Party:
INTERTEK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RADIAL, INC. v. RTW Retailwinds Acquisition LLC
as 2:2024mc00032
Plaintiff:
RADIAL, INC.
Defendant:
RTW Retailwinds Acquisition LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BOGDON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02291
Plaintiff:
ADELENA BOGDON
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AIR METHODS, LLC et al v. INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, LLC
as 2:2024cv02293
Plaintiff:
AIR METHODS, LLC and ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, LLC
GREYSTONE MORTGAGE, INC. et al v. EQUIFAX WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02260
Plaintiff:
GREYSTONE MORTGAGE, INC. and FIRST FINANCIAL LENDING LLC
Defendant:
EQUIFAX WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC and EQUIFAX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOWNES
as 5:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVAUGHN DOWNES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Mail Fraud Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
