Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams et al v. BASF Catalysts LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02402
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEE WILLIAMS , NANCY PEASE , MARILYN L. HOLLEY and others
Defendant:
BASF CATALYSTS LLC , CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL LLP , Cahill Gordon & Reindel and others
Third_party_defendant:
BEVAN & ASSOCIATES LPA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
PACKER v. RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv08110
Plaintiff:
BRAD PACKER
Defendant:
RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, RAGING CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD., WILLIAM C. MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PACKER v. ORBCOMM, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv07949
Plaintiff:
BRAD PACKER
Defendant:
ORBCOMM, INC., RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, RAGING CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PACKER v. RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv07949
Plaintiff:
BRAD PACKER
Defendant:
RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, RAGING CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD., WILLIAM C. MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ZASLOV v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv05771
Plaintiff:
MARTIN ZASLOV
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CONSERVATION FORCE et al v. PORRINO, et al
as 3:2016cv04124
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION FORCE , ROBERT VIDEN, JR. , PETER HEFFERAN and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PORRINO and BOB MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
REED v. VALVE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv04099
Plaintiff:
JAYME REED
Defendant:
VALVE CORPORATION , CSGOLOTTO INC., TREVOR A. MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
KEATING v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 3:2016cv04030
Plaintiff:
MARTIN KEATING
Defendant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
