Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 21 Plus, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
21 Plus, Inc., Jason G. Marks and Bill F. Holst
Cause Of Action: Unauthorized Publication or Use of Communications
Spring et al v. Stepp et al
as 2:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
Charles Spring and Helen F Findley
Defendant:
Cathy Stepp , Patrick Stevens , Lynne B Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
B, et al v. Governor WI, et al
as 2:1993cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jeanine B , Aline H , Maurice R and others
Defendant:
Governor State of Wisconsin and Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Mitsche et al
as 2:2009cv01126
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Kenneth N Mitsche, Franco John Ithier and K&F Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1983
Barreras v. Salerno et al
as 3:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
David Barreras
Defendant:
F. Robert Salerno and David Purinton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 2:2009cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christine F Armstrong and Nicolee Torrey
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Aydemir v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ahmet Aydemir
Defendant:
Michael B Mukasey, Emilio T Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
United States of America v. Narut
as 2:2008mc00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Noel F Narut
Sharif v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
Asad Sharif
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter D Keisler, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Petition for Hearing Before a District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
