Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00318
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Overby, et al v. Tyco International, et al
as 1:2002cv01357
Defendant:
Michael Ashcroft, Mark A. Belnick, Robert A. Bent and others
Notice Only:
Michael J Beck
Plaintiff:
Eugene Crouch, Marvin Overby, Peter Poffenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
USA, ex rel. et al v. Exeter Health Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00444
Defendant:
Core Health Services, Inc., Exeter Health Resources, Inc., Exeter Healthcare, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, State of New Hampshire, Ex Rel and USA, Ex Rel
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Does 1-100
as 1:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Markem-Imaje Corporation
Defendant:
Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carlberg v. NH Department of Safety et al
as 1:2008cv00230
Defendant:
NH Department of Safety, NH Attorney General, NH Department of Safety, Commissioner and others
Plaintiff:
William Carey Carlberg, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Brooks et al
as 1:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Hall
Defendant:
Kent A. Brooks, 1953 Realty Group, LLC, Millennium Auto Wholesale, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
