Cases 41 - 50 of 366
CICCOTELLI v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03708
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B PAGE, KATHRYN G JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
DAVYDOV v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03755
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVYDOV
Defendant:
CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B PAGE, KATHRYN G JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. SELECT BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04033
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
SELECT BANCORP, INC., J GARY CICCONE, JAMES H GLEN, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv04054
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION, SCOTT N GREENBERG, TAMAR ELKELES and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BAKER v. STRONGBRIDGE BIOPHARMA PLC et al
as 2:2021cv03842
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
STRONGBRIDGE BIOPHARMA PLC, GARHENG KONG, DAVID GILL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
ROBERSON v. STRONGBRIDGE BIOPHARMA PLC et al
as 2:2021cv03565
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ROBERSON
Defendant:
STRONGBRIDGE BIOPHARMA PLC, JOHN H. JOHNSON, DAVID GILL and others
WHITFIELD v. THE NEW HOME COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03727
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
THE NEW HOME COMPANY, INC., H. LAWRENCE WEBB, WAYNE J STELMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN et al
as 2:2021cv03528
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, LYDIA I BEEBE, LU M CORDOVA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Justice, II v. MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv02844
Defendant:
WALTER J ASPATORE, JOSEPH D GAREA, RANDOLPH C PASCHKE and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. W.R. GRACE & CO. et al
as 2:2021cv02842
Defendant:
DIANE H GULYAS, W.R. GRACE & CO., JULIE FASONE HOLDER and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
