Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Dimock et al v. Ethicon et al
as 2:2015mc00819
Plaintiff:
Carol Dimock
Defendant:
Ethicon , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology , Johnson & Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Peggy A. Norton
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Federal Election Commission v. Johnson
as 2:2015cv00439
Defendant:
Jeremy David Johnson and John Swallow
Plaintiff:
Federal Election Commission
Respondent:
Ronald J. Yengich
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 30116 Limitations on Contributions and Expenditures
Solid Q Holdings v. Arenal Energy et al
as 2:2015cv00419
Plaintiff:
Solid Q Holdings
Defendant:
Arenal Energy , Richard Reincke, Eric Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care v. Reyes
as 2:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes
Movant:
1-800 Contacts and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2012mc00242
Petitioner:
Kerry Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Johnson v. Chartway Federal Credit Union
as 2:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ramon K. Johnson
Defendant:
Chartway Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. Johnson Mark LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jeannette M. Martinez
Defendant:
Johnson Mark LLC and Bringhurst Process Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Lone Wolf Wireline
as 2:2012cv01087
Plaintiff:
Darren Johnson
Defendant:
Lone Wolf Wireline and Rick Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hayes et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Peter Hayes , Thi-Ly Downing-Hays , George Eugene Barton and others
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company and PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
