Cases 41 - 50 of 51
World Trade Center Properties, L.L.C. et al v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03719
Plaintiff:
World Trade Center Properties, L.L.C., 2 World Trade Center, L.L.C. and 4 World Trade Center, L.L.C.
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc., UAL Corporation, American Airlines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
World Trade Center Properties LLC. et al v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03722
Plaintiff:
World Trade Center Properties LLC., 1 World Trade Center L.L.C., 3 World Trade Center L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., AMR Corporation, United Airlines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chico's FAS, Inc. v. Alitalia-Linee Italiane S.p.a. et al
as 1:2008cv01155
Plaintiff:
Chico's FAS, Inc.
Defendant:
Alitalia-Linee Italiane S.p.a., Aerolineas Brasileiras S.A., Air China Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LaFlamme v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG et al
as 1:2008cv01079
Plaintiff:
Eugene M. LaFlamme
Defendant:
Deutsche Lufthansa AG, United Air Lines, Inc. and American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2007cv10593
Plaintiff:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Air Transportation
American Airlines, Inc. et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, et al
as 1:2007cv07051
Plaintiff:
American Airlines, Inc., AMR Corporation, UAL Corps. and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller and United Airlines, Inc.
Amicu:
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
American Airlines, Inc. et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2007cv07050
Plaintiff:
American Airlines, Inc., AMR Corporation, United Airlines, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency and Michael V. Hayden
Amicu:
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
ABM International, Inc. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv00888
Defendant:
Lan Airlines S.A., Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd., Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
ABM International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: September 11 Property Damage and Business Loss Litigation
as 1:2021mc00101
Defendant:
Syska & Hennessy Group, Inc., Flack & Kurtz, Inc., Riggs National Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, Compagnie Generale De Reassurance De Monte Carlo, Koudis International, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Massachusetts Port Authority, Colgan Air Inc. and United Air Lines, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
80 Lafayette Associates, L.L.C., Espeed, Inc., Cantor Index Limited and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., Burns International Security Services Corp., AMR Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Hitchcock & Cummings, LLP and Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Airports Council International - North America
Intervenor:
The New York Times Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
TIG Insurance Company
Claimant:
Ellen Mariani
Aegis Insurance Services, Inc. et al v. 7 World Trade Center Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2004cv07272
Defendant:
Syska & Hennessy Group, Inc., AMEC Construction Management Inc., 7 World Trade Center Company, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Aegis Insurance Services, Inc., Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., National Union Insurance Company of Pittsburgh and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Intervenors The WTC Plaintiffs
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
7 World Trade Company, L.P.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Johnson Controls World Services Inc. and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Cross Defendant:
Swanke Hayden Connell Arche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
