Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sheppard et al v. Mandalay Bay, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01120
Plaintiff:
Francisco Calzadillas, Jovanna Calzadillas, Stephanie Fraser and others
Defendant:
MGM Resorts Festival Grounds, LLC, MGM Resorts International, MGM Resorts Venue Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00888
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Franchi v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00415
Defendant:
Charles L. Atwood, Stephen Comer, Ron Huberman and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ohigashi v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00387
Defendant:
Charles L. Atwood, Stephen Comer, Ron Huberman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ohigashi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00314
Defendant:
Charles L. Atwood, Stephen Comer, Ron Huberman and others
Plaintiff:
George Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
