Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abrahamson, Shirley et al v. Neitzel, Scott et al
as 3:2015cv00211
Defendant:
Annette Kingsland Ziegler, Ann Walsh Bradley, Margaret Brady and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chris Martinson, Dara Mailette, Orville Seymer and others
Plaintiff:
Hilde Adler, David Perkins, Shirley S. Abrahamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollack v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 2:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
Laura Anne Pollack
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Speakeasy GB LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00343
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Speakeasy GB LLC and Lydia Ann Gajeski
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
In re: Subpoena Duces Tecum of David D Ricken
as 1:2012mc00019
Movant:
David L Ricken
Respondent:
Kevin B McCarthy , Albert H Langsenkamp , BVM Foundation Inc and others
Ubrogee_defendant:
Paul Hartman
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. South Chase Saloon LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
South Chase Saloon LLC, Craig L Hilbert and Dolly Ann Hilbert
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. South Chase Saloon LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
South Chase Saloon LLC, Craig L Hilbert and Dolly Ann Hilbert
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
