Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 90,627
Juan Ramirez-Acosta v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1961
Petitioner: JUAN RAMIREZ-ACOSTA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Juarez-Flores v. Garland
as 24-3494
Petitioner: JORGE JUAREZ-FLORES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez v. Garland
as 24-3489
Petitioner: JOSE FERNANDO CHAVEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pineda Morales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3487
Petitioner: ROBERTO CARLOS PINEDA MORALES, FRANCIS SARAHI MOLINA VIDEA and KYLIAN SLEVIN PINEDA MOLINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lin v. Garland
as 24-3488
Petitioner: SU HUA LIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez-Cax v. Garland
as 24-3511
Petitioner: CLAUDIA YESENIA CHAVEZ-CAX
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Grueso Marquez v. Garland
as 24-60274
Petitioner: Julio Cesar Grueso Marquez
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Jose Araujo Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3467
Petitioner: JOSE ROB ARAUJO HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Harper v. Georges, et al.
as 24-3514
Plaintiff: PATRICK ROY HARPER
Defendant: PETER GEORGES, individually and in his official capacity as California Department of Fish and Wildlife, LORI FRUGOLI, individually and in her official capacity as District Attorney County of Marin, MICHAEL WEAR, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy District Attorney County of Marin and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?