Cases 41 - 50 of 63
William Pfeifer, et al. v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.
as CAC/2:09-CV-05549
Plaintiff:
William Pfeifer
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc
Billy Richard Folston et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05792
Plaintiff:
Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Anderson, Greenwood & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Nancy Jo Banchik, et al. v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.
as CAC/2:09-CV-04744
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jo Banchik
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc
Ellis Staton, et al v. USDC-CAC
as 09-72230
:
In re: ELLIS MICHAEL STATON and SUSAN MARY STATON
Petitioner:
ELLIS MICHAEL STATON and SUSAN MARY STATON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY, AKA Garnder Denver Nash, LLC, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, individually and as successor-Central Environmental Systems, Inc., FKA Borg-Warner Central Environmental Systems, Inc. and others
DEMARCO et al v. BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et al
as CT/3:09-CV-00373
Plaintiff:
DEMARCO
Defendant:
BUFFALO PUMPS, INC
BARNES et al v. BUFFALO PUMPS INC et al
as CT/3:08-CV-01464
Plaintiff:
BARNES
Defendant:
BUFFALO PUMPS INC
Hope Olivar, etc. v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.
as CT/3:07-CV-01912
Plaintiff:
Hope Olivar, etc.
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc
Richard Carroll, et al. v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.
as CT/3:08-CV-00707
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard Carroll
Robert I. Hayford, Jr., et al. v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.
as CT/3:08-CV-01479
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Hayford, Jr
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc
Mary Lou Vidergar, et al. v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.
as CAC/2:08-CV-04735
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Vidergar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
