Cases 41 - 50 of 91
O.M.M. v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv02108
Plaintiff:
O.M.M.
Defendant:
Eric Holder , United States Department of Justice , Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: Immigration Petition
Shah et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2012cv01610
Plaintiff:
Bhavesh Shah and Krupa Shah
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security , Janet Napolitano , Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Camacho v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
Nerelys Camacho
Defendant:
United States of America and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nnadi Linus Udengwu v. Eric Holder et al
as 8:2010cv01819
Plaintiff:
Nnadi Linus Udengwu
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, US Citizenship and Immigration Services USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Occupy Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv00297
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, City of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Occupy Los Angeles
Strong v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv02957
Plaintiff:
Douglas Strong
Defendant:
United States of America and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singh v. District Director San Francisco et al
as 2:2011cv02291
Plaintiff:
Sukhpal Singh
Defendant:
District Director San Francisco , Janet Napolitano and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05810
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Singh v. District Director San Francisco et al
as 3:2011cv03065
Plaintiff:
Sukhpal Singh
Defendant:
District Director San Francisco, Janet Napolitano and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Yohanes Haile Beyene et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv04445
Plaintiff:
Tsege Ayele and Yohanes Haile Beyene
Defendant:
Eric Holder and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
