Other Statutes Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02926
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Guy v. TRS Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01622
Plaintiff: George Guy
Defendant: TRS Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Samson et al v. Manlove et al
as 1:2014cv03661
Plaintiff: Richard J. Samson, Rebecca M. Wilson, Travis Munden and others
Defendant: George Manlove , Paul Nisbet and John Does 1-10
Consol_defendant: Jill Manlove , Rob Standley , Mark Hopwood and others
Respondent: GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Samson et al v. Manlove et al
as 1:2014mi00116
Plaintiff: Richard J. Samson, Rebecca M. Wilson, Travis Munden and others
Defendant: George Manlove , Paul Nisbet and John Does 1-10
Consol_defendant: Jill Manlove , Rob Standley , Mark Hopwood and others
Respondent: GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Anderson v. American Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03032
Plaintiff: George Anderson
Defendant: American Credit Acceptance Corporation and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Gergely v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv02664
Plaintiff: George Gergely
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00681
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00644
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?