Cases 41 - 50 of 182
Kawar v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv11330
Plaintiff:
Raad Kawar
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson , James B. Comey, Jr. , Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2016cv10861
Plaintiff:
Antar Munasser and Jeh Johnson
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jr., Thomas Cioppa and John Kerry
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Li et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv06392
Plaintiff:
Yan Nan Chen, Yan Qing Chen and Hua Li
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MANNING v. CLAPPER et al
as 1:2016cv02307
Plaintiff:
CHELSEA E. MANNING
Defendant:
JAMES R. CLAPPER, LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chen v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05743
Plaintiff:
Quan Chen
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maan Bazzi v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 16-2406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAAN BAZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, JAMES B. COMEY, CHRISTOPHER M. PIEHOTA and others
ZHENG v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05251
Plaintiff:
DAMI ZHENG
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
NI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05250
Plaintiff:
WEI LE NI
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jiang v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv04704
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Robert Cowan, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Yun Jiang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05156
Plaintiff:
Ya Ting Chen
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
