Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K.E.N. et al v. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2015cv00029
Petitioner:
K.E.N. and Helge Naber
Respondent:
Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Richard Opper, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Core-Mark International, Inc. v. The Montana Board of Livestock et al
as 6:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Core-Mark International, Inc.
Defendant:
The Montana Board of Livestock, Jan French, Linda Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Glasser v. Desert Ranch LLLP et al
as 2:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Glasser
Defendant:
Desert Ranch LLLP , Desert Ranch Management LLC , Timothy L. Blixseth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Johnson v. Homeowners of the Unincorporated Association of Whirry's Wild Rivers Subdivision et al
as 9:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Frederica Johnson
Defendant:
Homeowners of the Unincorporated Association of Whirry's Wild Rivers Subdivision , Carrie Aageson , George H. Codling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
French v. McLean et al
as 4:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Mark French
Defendant:
Edward McLean , Blair Jones , Victor Valgenti and others
Amicu:
Mike McGrath , Jim Rice , Michael Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cox v. McLean et al
as 9:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
Dan Cox
Defendant:
Edward McLean, Blair Jones, Victor Valgenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. Jewell et al
as 9:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
Defendant:
Sarah Sally Jewell, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, Jocko Valley Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
